Posts Tagged ‘about’

Something to think about..?

Question: Something to think about..?
PLEASE READ!

I’ve been thinking about whats beyond Earth lately and began to convince myself that far more intelligent alien life forms MUST exist. If you think about it, all of the things created by mankind thus far are all made up of rescources from our Earth alone and ONLY Earth. Now think of the infinite amount of planets that exist in space and the variety of “resources” found on each and every one. Since its quite obviously that our resources that we’re limited to can only take us so far (As in space travel, etc.), there must be another planet out there with intelligent life that has rescources much more powerful than ours that can take them to much farther places. Thats why I believe that it’s only a matter of time before us humans come in contact with alien life..

By the way, I am very high right now, and I can honestly say that I would’ve never come up with that if I were sober.. so therefore,

LEGALIZE MARIJUANA <3

Answer:

Answer by ??????????? iRippedMyShirtToday ??????????????
LMAOOO! It’s funny because Everytime I get high I go through the same thing! OMG

Cultural Competence — What are you doing about it?

This Public Service Announcement, created in 2006, is a legacy project of the first cohort of the AHA/HRET Culturally Competence Leadership Fellowship. Fellows from Texas Health Resources, along with 12 other health-related organizations, collaborated on this PSA to raise awareness about challenges experienced by patients due to language, communication or cultural barriers in the process of seeking healthcare. For more information, visit TexasHealth.org/DiversityandInclusion. Texas Health Resources 1-877-THR-WELL www.TexasHealth.org

Lecture Series on Human Resource Management-I by Prof.Kalyan Chakravarti, Vinod Gupta School of Management, IIT Kharagpur. For more details on NPTEL visit nptel.iitm.ac.in

their’s something about mars and the moon…..?

Question: their’s something about mars and the moon…..?
if you didn’t know mars was inhabited NASA has been keeping it a secret their was evidence about the Martian Inca city, animal fossils, and Martian fossils. their’s even a transportation system which involves tubes above ground and underground….even little water beneath the Martian land….and the moon its nothing like other moons…if you didn’t notice the moon doesn’t rotate it only orbits the earth..how come mars’s moons or Jupiter’s moons rotate but not ours? we cant even see the dark side of the moon even NASA discovered towers a mile high and small cities. either the aliens weren’t able to colonize the earth because billions of years ago it was a toxic planet. the ocean was green filled with iron deposits and their was NO oxygen and NO atmosphere. after dinosaurs were ruling they still couldn’t colonize because of the giants. after the meteor it was still uninhabitable because the landscape was a barren wasteland…after the earth was healing it self thats when mammals and humans evolved…and they knew we were at the point of discovering them and they decided to leave earth alone….the one question is “did they drain all of their resources?” “was their a massive storm on mars?” “was their a major war that wiped out the Martian citizens that the power aliens were evacuated and scattered across the solar system? i might have an active imagination but just look at the evidence!

do you think something is wrong with the moon? was mars civilized?

Answer:

What do you think about Executive Order 10998? See details?

Question: What do you think about Executive Order 10998? See details?
SECTION 1. Scope. The Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary) shall prepare national emergency plans and develop preparedness programs covering: Food resources, farm equipment, fertilizer, and food resource facilities, as defined below; rural fire control; defense against biological warfare, chemical warfare, and radiological fallout pertaining to agricultural activities; and rural defense information and education. These plans and programs shall be designed to develop a state of readiness in these areas with respect to all conditions of national emergency, including attack upon the United States.

As used in this order:
(a) “Food resources” means all commodities and products, simple, mixed or compound, or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being eaten or drunk, by either human beings or animals’ irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be. put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodit

Answer:

Answer by ????? ??????? ??? ??????
What’s wrong with that?

What do you think about Executive Order 10998? See details?

Question: What do you think about Executive Order 10998? See details?
SECTION 1. Scope. The Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary) shall prepare national emergency plans and develop preparedness programs covering: Food resources, farm equipment, fertilizer, and food resource facilities, as defined below; rural fire control; defense against biological warfare, chemical warfare, and radiological fallout pertaining to agricultural activities; and rural defense information and education. These plans and programs shall be designed to develop a state of readiness in these areas with respect to all conditions of national emergency, including attack upon the United States.

As used in this order:
(a) “Food resources” means all commodities and products, simple, mixed or compound, or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being eaten or drunk, by either human beings or animals’ irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be. put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodit

Answer:

Answer by thegubmint
Since you seem to be questioning it, does that mean you don’t want the Government to plan for contingencies in case of dire emergencies? That order was executed by JFK at the height of the cold war, when it was thought a nuclear war had a high likelihood of happening. Why wouldn’t the government plan for such eventualities?

Why people are still confused about what happened to the neanderthals?

Question: Why people are still confused about what happened to the neanderthals?
I don’t see why people say it’s still a debate as to what happened to the Neanderthals. Scientists always say that Neanderthals and humans “competed for resources,” but don’t exactly elaborate on what that “competition” was.

Look at the Woolly mammoth, cave bear, saber-toothed tiger, etc etc. Do we say that these creatures went extinct because they couldn’t “compete with the humans for resources?” NO! Because the notion that an animal and a human can compete for resources is absurd – the human has such an advantage that the status of man as hunter and animal as hunted is firmly established.

It’s EXACTLY THE SAME for the Neanderthals. The Neanderthals were ANIMALS in every sense compared to the modern humans. Their extinction was as inevitable as the Woolly mammoth and the saber-toothed tiger.

Look at how woolly mammoths and saber-toothed tigers died. They died for two reasons: 1) humans hunted them (in the case of the mammoth) and 2) humans hunted the animals’ prey leaving little left (saber-toothed tiger). So it’s likely that there is a combination of the above causes for the extinction of Neanderthals (direct, indirect).

But what would happen if humans hunted the animals that the Neanderthals also hunted, leaving them with insufficient food? They would resort to 1) cannibalism or 2) attempting to hunt humans (this would be entirely reasonable to them because they would be eliminating the competitor AND getting a food source, effectively killing two birds with one stone). If 1) happened, it’s obvious what happened, the Neanderthals ate themselves to extinction. If 2) happened, the Neanderthal aggression would be met with powerful retaliation, and immediately, the Neanderthals would be decimated.

It’s plainly obvious. It’s frustrating how scientists try to look for evidence and THEN make a hypothesis as if any deviation from the scientific method spells disaster. With a little common sense and intuition, it’s SO OBVIOUS that there was tremendous violence between humans and neanderthals, and further evidence will show that to be profoundly true.

Answer:

Answer by The Inquisitor
people like to romanticize the horrid truth.

Why people are still confused about what happened to the neanderthals?

Question: Why people are still confused about what happened to the neanderthals?
I don’t see why people say it’s still a debate as to what happened to the Neanderthals. Scientists always say that Neanderthals and humans “competed for resources,” but don’t exactly elaborate on what that “competition” was.

Look at the Woolly mammoth, cave bear, saber-toothed tiger, etc etc. Do we say that these creatures went extinct because they couldn’t “compete with the humans for resources?” NO! Because the notion that an animal and a human can compete for resources is absurd – the human has such an advantage that the status of man as hunter and animal as hunted is firmly established.

It’s EXACTLY THE SAME for the Neanderthals. The Neanderthals were ANIMALS in every sense compared to the modern humans. Their extinction was as inevitable as the Woolly mammoth and the saber-toothed tiger.

Look at how woolly mammoths and saber-toothed tigers died. They died for two reasons: 1) humans hunted them (in the case of the mammoth) and 2) humans hunted the animals’ prey leaving little left (saber-toothed tiger). So it’s likely that there is a combination of the above causes for the extinction of Neanderthals (direct, indirect).

But what would happen if humans hunted the animals that the Neanderthals also hunted, leaving them with insufficient food? They would resort to 1) cannibalism or 2) attempting to hunt humans (this would be entirely reasonable to them because they would be eliminating the competitor AND getting a food source, effectively killing two birds with one stone). If 1) happened, it’s obvious what happened, the Neanderthals ate themselves to extinction. If 2) happened, the Neanderthal aggression would be met with powerful retaliation, and immediately, the Neanderthals would be decimated.

It’s plainly obvious. It’s frustrating how scientists try to look for evidence and THEN make a hypothesis as if any deviation from the scientific method spells disaster. With a little common sense and intuition, it’s SO OBVIOUS that there was tremendous violence between humans and neanderthals, and further evidence will show that to be profoundly true.

Answer:

Answer by The Inquisitor
people like to romanticize the horrid truth.

Roman Catholics: Will you ask about “Charity & Truth” (2009 Encyclical) to read it? NEW Church Teaching?

Question: Roman Catholics: Will you ask about “Charity & Truth” (2009 Encyclical) to read it? NEW Church Teaching?
(From NY TIMES Coverage July 7):
Benedict is scheduled to meet with Obama on Friday and is expected to raise the issues discussed in his encyclical, “Caritas in Veritate” (Charity in Truth). He has been working on the document since 2007, but said he refrained from issuing earlier it in order to update it to reflect the world’s current economic troubles.

In recent months, Benedict has frequently spoken out on the crisis, pushing for world leaders to make certain that the poor aren’t forgotten in the struggle to deal with the world financial crisis. In the encyclical, Benedict lays out his view of the problems with globalization, saying that it limits state sovereignty and power, which humans had turned to in the past to address the challenges of the day. The current economic crisis was created primarily by the private sector, Benedict writes, and states are having difficulty responding.

Therefore, he says, the world’s population must engage in new ways — through civil society, creative government collaborations and creating new international institutions.

Benedict also urges more respect toward the environment, saying that more advanced countries must lower their domestic energy consumption, either through technology or through great ecological sensitivity among citizens. He also advocates more research into alternative energy consumption and pushes for a worldwide distribution of energy resources.

“The fate of those [poorer] countries cannot be left in the hands of whoever is first to claim the spoils, or whoever is able to prevail over the rest,” he writes.

Answer:

Answer by path. finder
i do not have enough room so i’ll make this quick— just because one writes it or says it does not make so.—even god repented over some of his works

Question about privacy policy?

Question: Question about privacy policy?
I reported a US Government worker for some wrong doings. Their “Human Resource” boss… or Personel Department gave this US Government worker I reported my phone number. What can I do about this? That is a privacy issue. Thanks for any input!
plus we don’t know what this government worker is capable of, he’s a very angry man…
I called attorney general, they don’t handle these types of problems, they suggested making a police report… for our own protection…

you get best answer though since you are the only one who answered, lol! =)

Thanks!

Answer:

Answer by regerugged
Contact the US Attorney General’s office nearest you. Ask for protection and have them investigate who leaked your name.

what the explanation for this article??its all about human resources in management?

Question: what the explanation for this article??its all about human resources in management?
Human resource management (HRM) is the strategic and coherent approach to the management of an organization’s most valued assets – the people working there who individually and collectively contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the business.[1] The terms “human resource management” and “human resources” (HR) have largely replaced the term “personnel management” as a description of the processes involved in managing people in organizations.[1] Human Resource management is evolving rapidly. Human resource management is both an academic theory and a business practice that addresses the theoretical and practical techniques of managing a workforce.

Answer:

Answer by Miles C
Personnel Departments are now called Human Resource Department

Human Resource management is evolving rapidly (dah).